|








| | UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT OF 2002 vs. SECURITIES ACT OF
WASHINGTON vs. SECURITIES DIVISION DRAFT BILL
This chart compares the Uniform Securities
Act of 2002 (USA), including all published errata as of 8/5/2005, to the current
Securities Act of Washington and to the Securities Division’s draft bill as
discussed with the WSBA Securities Committee USA Study Group. Where comparable
language exists, it is placed side by side. The comment column on the right
offers preliminarily explanation of the Division draft approach or provides
additional information.
|
ARTICLE 5 – FRAUD
AND LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
§501. GENERAL
FRAUD. It is unlawful for a
person, in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security,
directly or indirectly:
(1) to employ a
device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(2) to make an
untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or
(3)
to engage in an act, practice, or course of business that operates or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon another person. |
RCW 21.20.010
Unlawful offers, sales, purchases.
It is unlawful for
any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any
security, directly or indirectly:
(1) To employ any
device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
(2) To make any
untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact
necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; or
(3) To engage in any
act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as
a fraud or deceit upon any person. |
§ 34.
GENERAL FRAUD.
It is unlawful for a person, in connection with
the offer, sale, or purchase of a security, directly or indirectly:
(1) To employ a device, scheme, or
artifice to defraud;
(2) To make an untrue statement of a
material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to
make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading; or
(3) To engage in an act, practice, or
course of business that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit
upon another person. |
USA |
|
§502. PROHIBITED
CONDUCT IN PROVIDING INVESTMENT ADVICE.
(a) [Fraud in
providing investment advice.] It is unlawful for a person that
advises others for compensation, either directly or indirectly or
through publications or writings, as to the value of securities or the
advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities or that,
for compensation and as part of a regular business, issues or
promulgates analyses or reports relating to securities:
(1) to employ a
device, scheme, or artifice to defraud another person; or
(2) to engage in an
act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as a
fraud or deceit upon another person.
(b) [Rules
defining fraud.] A rule adopted under this [Act] may define an act,
practice, or course of business of an investment adviser or an
investment adviser representative, other than a supervised person of a
federal covered investment adviser, as fraudulent, deceptive, or
manipulative, and prescribe means reasonably designed to prevent
investment advisers and investment adviser representatives, other than
supervised persons of a federal covered investment adviser, from
engaging in acts, practices, and courses of business defined as
fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative. |
RCW 21.20.020
Unlawful acts of person advising another.
(1) It is unlawful
for any person who receives any consideration from another party
primarily for advising the other person as to the value of securities or
their purchase or sale, whether through the issuance of analyses or
reports or otherwise:
(a) To employ any
device, scheme, or artifice to defraud the other person;
(b) To engage in any
act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as
a fraud or deceit upon the other person; or
(c) To engage in any
dishonest or unethical practice as the director may define by rule.
This subsection (1)
applies whether or not the person is an investment adviser, federal
covered adviser, or investment adviser under this chapter or the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
|
§ 35.
PROHIBITED CONDUCT IN PROVIDING
INVESTMENT ADVICE.
(1) Fraud in providing investment advice. It is
unlawful for a person that advises others for compensation, either
directly or indirectly or through publications or writings, as to the
value of securities or the advisability of investing in, purchasing, or
selling securities or that, for compensation and as part of a regular
business, issues or promulgates analyses or reports relating to
securities:
(a) To employ a device, scheme,
or artifice to defraud another person; or
(b) To engage in an act, practice, or
course of business that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit
upon another person.
(2)
Rules defining fraud. A rule adopted under this
chapter may define an act, practice, or course of business of an
investment adviser or an investment adviser representative, other than a
supervised person of a federal covered investment adviser, as
fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative, and prescribe means reasonably
designed to prevent investment advisers and investment adviser
representatives, other than supervised persons of a federal covered
investment adviser, from engaging in acts, practices, and courses of
business defined as fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative. |
USA |
|
|
.020(2) It is unlawful for
an investment adviser, acting as principal for his or her own account,
knowingly to sell any security to or purchase any security from a
client, or act as a broker for a person other than such client,
knowingly to effect any sale or purchase of any security for the account
of such client, without disclosing to such client in writing before the
execution of such transaction the capacity in which he or she is acting
and obtaining the consent of the client to such transaction.
This subsection (2)
does not apply to a transaction with a customer of a broker-dealer if
the broker-dealer is not acting as an investment adviser in relation to
the transaction.
|
|
USA (definition of
IA includes “holding out” concept and RCW 21.20.020(2) may be addressed
by rule) |
|
(c) [Rules
specifying contents of advisory contract.] A rule adopted under this
[Act] may specify the contents of an investment advisory contract
entered into, extended, or renewed by an investment adviser. |
RCW 21.20.030. Unlawful acts of investment adviser.
It is unlawful for
any investment adviser to enter into, extend, or renew any investment
advisory contract unless it provides in writing:
(1) That the investment adviser shall not be compensated on the
basis of a share of capital gains upon or capital appreciation of the
funds or any portion of the funds of the client; however, this
subsection does not prohibit: (a) An investment advisory contract which
provides for compensation based upon the total of a fund averaged over a
definite period, or as of definite dates or taken as of a definite date;
or (b) performance compensation arrangements permitted under any rule
the director may adopt in order to allow performance compensation
arrangements permitted under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and
regulations promulgated by the securities and exchange commission
thereunder;
(2) That no assignment of the contract may be made by the
investment adviser without the consent of the other party to the
contract; and
(3) That the investment adviser, if a partnership, shall notify the
other party to the contract of any change in the membership of the
partnership within a reasonable time after the change.
"Assignment", as used in subsection (2) of this section, includes
any direct or indirect transfer or hypothecation of an investment
advisory contract by the assignor or of a controlling block of the
assignor's outstanding voting securities by a security holder of the
assignor; but, if the investment adviser is a partnership, no assignment
of an investment advisory contract is considered to result from the
death or withdrawal of a minority of the members of the investment
adviser having only a minority interest in the business of the
investment adviser, or from the admission to the investment adviser of
one or more members who, after admission, will be only a minority of the
members and will have only a minority interest in the business.
|
§ 35(3).
Contents of
advisory contract. It is unlawful for any investment adviser to enter
into, extend, or renew any investment advisory contract unless it
provides in writing:
(a) That the investment adviser shall
not be compensated on the basis of a share of capital gains upon or
capital appreciation of the funds or any portion of the funds of the
client. However, this subsection does not prohibit:
(i) An investment advisory
contract which provides for compensation based upon the total of a fund
averaged over a definite period, or as of definite dates or taken as of
a definite date; or
(ii) Performance compensation
arrangements permitted under any rule the director may adopt in order to
allow performance compensation arrangements permitted under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and regulations promulgated by the
securities and exchange commission thereunder;
(b) That no assignment of the
contract may be made by the investment adviser without the consent of
the other party to the contract; and
(c) That the investment adviser, if a
partnership, shall notify the other party to the contract of any change
in the membership of the partnership within a reasonable time after the
change.
"Assignment," as used in (b) of this
subsection, includes any direct or indirect transfer or hypothecation of
an investment advisory contract by the assignor or of a controlling
block of the assignor's outstanding voting securities by a security
holder of the assignor; but, if the investment adviser is a partnership,
no assignment of an investment advisory contract is considered to result
from the death or withdrawal of a minority of the members of the
investment adviser having only a minority interest in the business of
the investment adviser, or from the admission to the investment adviser
of one or more members who, after admission, will be only a minority of
the members and will have only a minority interest in the business.
(4) Subsection (1) of this section
applies whether or not the person is an investment adviser, federal
covered investment adviser, or investment adviser representative under
this chapter or the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. |
RCW 21.20.030
retained as § 35(3). |
|
|
.020(1) This subsection (1)
applies whether or not the person is an investment adviser, federal
covered adviser, or investment adviser under this chapter or the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940. |
§ 35(4)
Subsection (1) of this section applies whether or not the person is an
investment adviser, federal covered investment adviser, or investment
adviser representative under this chapter or the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940. |
RCW 21.20.020(1)
“flush” language retained as §35(4). |
|
§503. EVIDENTIARY
BURDEN.
(a) [Civil.]
In a civil action or administrative proceeding under this [Act], a
person claiming an exemption, exception, preemption, or exclusion has
the burden to prove the applicability of the claim.
(b) [Criminal.]
In a criminal proceeding under this [Act], a person claiming an
exemption, exception, preemption, or exclusion has the burden of going
forward with evidence of the claim. |
RCW 21.20.540.
Exemptions, exceptions, and preemptions -- Burden of proof.
In any proceeding
under this chapter, the burden of proving an exemption, an exception
from a definition, or a preemption of a provision of this chapter is
upon the person claiming it.
|
§ 36.
EVIDENTIARY BURDEN.
(1) Civil. In a civil action or administrative
proceeding under this chapter, a person claiming an exemption,
exception, preemption, or exclusion has the burden to prove the
applicability of the claim.
(2) Criminal. In a criminal
proceeding under this chapter, a person claiming an exemption,
exception, preemption, or exclusion has the burden of going forward with
evidence of the claim. |
USA |
|
§504. FILING OF
SALES AND ADVERSTISING LITERATURE.
(a) [Filing
requirement.] Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), a
rule adopted or order issued under this [Act] may require the filing of
a prospectus, pamphlet, circular, form letter, advertisement, sales
literature, or other advertising record relating to a security or
investment advice, addressed or intended for distribution to prospective
investors, including clients or prospective clients of a person
registered or required to be registered as an investment adviser under
this [Act].
(b) [Excluded
communications.] This section does not apply to sales and advertising
literature specified in subsection (a) which relates to a federal
covered security, a federal covered investment adviser, or a security or
transaction exempted by Section 201, 202, or 203 except as required
pursuant to Section 201(7).
|
|
§ 37.
FILING OF SALES AND ADVERTISING
LITERATURE.
(1) Filing requirements. Except as otherwise
provided in subsection (2) of this section, a rule adopted or order
issued under this chapter may require the filing of a prospectus,
pamphlet, circular, form letter, advertisement, sales literature, or
other advertising record relating to a security or investment advice,
addressed or intended for distribution to prospective investors,
including clients or prospective clients of a person registered or
required to be registered as an investment adviser under this chapter.
(2) Excluded communications. This
section does not apply to sales or advertising literature specified in
subsection (1) of this section which relates to a federal covered
security or a federal covered investment adviser. |
USA less the
exclusions for advertisements or sales literature in connection with any
exemption. This traces current law and would allow the Division to
adopt rules that require the filing of advertising or sales literature
for certain exempt offerings, such as those under USA § 202(14). |
|
§505. MISLEADING
FILINGS. It is unlawful for a
person to make or cause to be made, in a record that is used in an
action or proceeding or filed under this [Act], a statement that, at the
time and in the light of the circumstances under which it is made, is
false or misleading in a material respect, or, in connection with the
statement, to omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statement made, in the light of the circumstances under which it was
made, not false or misleading. |
RCW 21.20.350
False or misleading statements in filed documents.
It is unlawful for
any person to make or cause to be made, in any document filed with the
director or in any proceeding under this chapter, any statement which
is, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it is
made, false or misleading in any material respect.
|
§ 38.
MISLEADING FILINGS.
It is unlawful for a person to make or cause to
be made, in a record that is used in an action or proceeding or filed
under this chapter, a statement that, at the time and in the light of
the circumstances under which it is made, is false or misleading in a
material respect, or, in connection with the statement, to omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in the light of
the circumstances under which it was made, not false or misleading. |
USA |
|
§506.
MISREPRESENTATIONS CONCERNING REGISTRATION OR EXEMPTION.
The filing of an application for
registration, a registration statement, a notice filing under this
[Act], the registration of a person, the notice filing by a person, or
the registration of a security under this [Act] does not constitute a
finding by the administrator that a record filed under this [Act] is
true, complete, and not misleading. The filing or registration or the
availability of an exemption, exception, preemption, or exclusion for a
security or a transaction does not mean that the administrator has
passed upon the merits or qualifications of, or recommended or given
approval to, a person, security, or transaction. It is unlawful to
make, or cause to be made, to a purchaser, customer, client, or
prospective customer or client a representation inconsistent with this
section. |
RCW 21.20.360
Filing, registration, statement, exemption not conclusive as to truth or
completeness -- Unlawful representations.
Neither the fact
that an application for registration under RCW
21.20.050, a registration statement under RCW
21.20.180 or
21.20.210 has been filed, nor the fact that a person or security if
[is] effectively registered, constitutes a finding by the director that
any document filed under this chapter is true, complete, and not
misleading. Neither any such fact nor the fact that an exemption or
exception is available for a security or a transaction means that the
director has passed in any way upon the merits of [or] qualifications
of, or recommended or given approval to, any person, security, or
transaction. It is unlawful to make, or cause to be made, to any
prospective purchaser, customer, or client any representation
inconsistent with this section. |
§ 39.
MISREPRESENTATIONS CONCERNING
REGISTRATION OR EXEMPTION. The filing of an
application for registration, a registration statement, a notice filing
under this chapter, the registration of a person, the notice filing by a
person, or the registration of a security under this chapter does not
constitute a finding by the director that a record filed under this
chapter is true, complete, and not misleading. The filing or
registration or the availability of an exemption, exception, preemption,
or exclusion for a security or a transaction does not mean that the
director has passed upon the merits or qualifications of, or recommended
or given approval to, a person, security, or transaction. It is
unlawful to make, or cause to be made, to a purchaser, customer, client,
or prospective customer or client a representation inconsistent with
this section. |
USA |
|
§507. QUALIFIED
IMMUNITY. A broker-dealer,
agent, investment adviser, federal covered investment adviser, or
investment adviser representative is not liable to another
broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, federal covered investment
adviser, or investment adviser representative for defamation relating to
a statement that is contained in a record required by the administrator,
or designee of the administrator, the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or a self-regulatory organization, unless the person knew,
or should have known at the time that the statement was made, that it
was false in a material respect or the person acted in reckless
disregard of the statement’s truth or falsity.
|
RCW 4.24.510. Communication to government agency or self-regulatory
organization -- Immunity from civil liability.
A person who
communicates a complaint or information to any branch or agency of
federal, state, or local government, or to any self-regulatory
organization that regulates persons involved in the securities or
futures business and that has been delegated authority by a federal,
state, or local government agency and is subject to oversight by the
delegating agency, is immune from civil liability for claims based upon
the communication to the agency or organization regarding any matter
reasonably of concern to that agency or organization. A person
prevailing upon the defense provided for in this section is entitled to
recover expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in establishing
the defense and in addition shall receive statutory damages of ten
thousand dollars. Statutory damages may be denied if the court finds
that the complaint or information was communicated in bad faith. |
§ 40.
IMMUNITY. A
"person" under RCW 4.24.510 includes a broker-dealer, sales agent,
investment adviser, federal covered investment adviser, or investment
adviser representative.
|
Division draft
incorporates by reference RCW 4.24.510, which addresses immunity for
securities industry complaints and reports. |
|
§508. CRIMINAL
PENALTIES. (a) [Criminal
penalties.] A person that willfully violates this [Act], or a rule
adopted or order issued under this [Act], except Section 504 [filing
of sales literature] or the notice filing requirements of Section
302 [federal covered securities] or 405 [federal covered
advisers], or that willfully violates Section 505 [false filing]
knowing the statement made to be false or misleading in a material
respect, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than $[___] or
imprisoned not more than [___] years, or both. An individual convicted
of violating a rule or order under this [Act] may be fined, but may not
be imprisoned, if the individual did not have knowledge of the rule or
order. |
RCW 21.20.400.
Penalty for violation of chapter -- Limitation of actions.
(1) Any person who
willfully violates any provision of this chapter except RCW
21.20.350, or who willfully violates any rule or order under this
chapter, or who willfully violates RCW
21.20.350 knowing the statement made to be false or misleading in
any material respect, is guilty of a class B felony and shall upon
conviction be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned
not more than ten years, or both; but no person may be imprisoned for
the violation of any rule or order if that person proves that he or she
had no knowledge of the rule or order.
|
§ 41.
CRIMINAL PENALTIES.
(1) Criminal penalties. (a) A person that
willfully violates this chapter, or a rule adopted or order issued under
this chapter, except section 37 of this act or the notice filing
requirements of section 14 or 25 of this act, or that willfully violates
section 38 of this act knowing the statement made to be false or
misleading in a material respect, is guilty of a class B felony
punishable under RCW 9A.20.021. An individual convicted of violating a
rule or order under this chapter may be fined, but may not be
imprisoned, if the individual did not have knowledge of the rule or
order. |
USA with additional
language to maintain current RCW scheme, making a criminal violation a
class B felony. |
|
|
(2) Any person who
knowingly alters, destroys, shreds, mutilates, or conceals a record,
document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to
impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an official
proceeding under this chapter, is guilty of a class B felony punishable
under RCW
9A.20.021(1)(b) or punishable by a fine of not more than five
hundred thousand dollars, or both. The fines paid under this subsection
shall be deposited into the securities prosecution fund. |
§ 41(1)(b).
Any
person who knowingly alters, destroys, shreds, mutilates, or conceals a
record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent
to impair the record's, document's, or object's integrity or
availability for use in an official proceeding under this chapter, is
guilty of a class B felony punishable by confinement under RCW 9A.20.021
or punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred thousand dollars,
or both. The fines paid under this subsection shall be deposited into
the securities prosecution fund. |
RCW 21.20.400(2)
retained. |
|
(b) [Criminal
reference not required.] The [Attorney General or the proper
prosecuting attorney] with or without a reference from the
administrator, may institute criminal proceedings under this [Act]. |
RCW 21.20.410
Attorney general, prosecuting attorney may institute criminal proceeding
-- Referral of evidence by director.
(1) The director may
refer such evidence as may be available concerning violations of this
chapter or of any rule or order hereunder to the attorney general or the
proper prosecuting attorney, who may in his or her discretion, with or
without such a reference, institute the appropriate criminal proceedings
under this chapter.
(2) The director may
render such assistance as the prosecuting attorney requests regarding a
reference. |
§ 41(2).
Criminal
reference not required. The director may refer such evidence as may be
available concerning violations of this chapter or of any rule or order
under this chapter to the attorney general or the proper prosecuting
attorney, who may in his or her discretion, with or without a reference
from the director, institute criminal proceedings under this chapter.
The director may render such assistance as the attorney general or
prosecuting attorney requests regarding a reference. |
RCW 21.20.410
largely retained, which affirmatively states that the Division can refer
and assist in criminal securities matters. |
|
(c) [No
limitation on other criminal enforcement.] This [Act] does not
limit the power of this State to punish a person for conduct that
constitutes a crime under other laws of this State. |
RCW 21.20.420
Criminal punishment, chapter not exclusive.
Nothing in this
chapter limits the power of the state to punish any person for any
conduct which constitutes a crime by statute or at common law. |
§ 41(3).
No limitation
on other criminal enforcement. This chapter does not limit the power of
this state to punish a person for conduct that constitutes a crime under
other laws of this state. |
USA |
|
|
RCW 21.20.400(1) No
indictment or information may be returned under this chapter more than
five years after the alleged violation. |
§ 41(4).
Statute of
limitations. No indictment or information may be returned under this
chapter more than:
(a) Five years after the violation;
or
(b) Three years after the actual
discovery of the violation;
whichever date of limitation is later. |
RCW 21.20.400(1)
criminal statute of limitations retained. |
|
§509. CIVIL
LIABILITY. (a) [Securities
Litigation Uniform Standards Act.] Enforcement of civil
liability under this section is subject to the Securities Litigation
Uniform Standards Act of 1998. |
RCW 21.20.430
Civil liabilities -- Survival, limitation of actions -- Waiver of
chapter void -- Scienter.
|
§ 42.
CIVIL LIABILITY.
(1) Securities Litigation Uniform Standards
Act. Enforcement of civil liability under this section is subject to
the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998. |
USA |
|
(b) [Liability of
seller to purchaser.] A person is liable to the purchaser if the
person sells a security in violation of Section 301 or, by means of an
untrue statement of a material fact or an omission to state a material
fact necessary in order to make the statement made, in light of the
circumstances under which it is made, not misleading, the purchaser not
knowing the untruth or omission and the seller not sustaining the burden
of proof that the seller did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable
care, could not have known of the untruth or omission. An action under
this subsection is governed by the following:
(1) The purchaser
may maintain an action to recover the consideration paid for the
security, less the amount of any income received on the security, and
interest [at the legal rate of interest] from the date of the purchase,
costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees determined by the court, upon the
tender of the security, or for actual damages as provided in paragraph
(3).
(2) The tender
referred to in paragraph (1) may be made any time before entry of
judgment. Tender requires only notice in a record of ownership of the
security and willingness to exchange the security for the amount
specified. A purchaser that no longer owns the security may recover
actual damages as provided in paragraph (3).
(3) Actual damages
in an action arising under this subsection are the amount that would be
recoverable upon a tender less the value of the security when the
purchaser disposed of it, and interest [at the legal rate of interest]
from the date of the purchase, costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees
determined by the court. |
(1) Any person, who
offers or sells a security in violation of any provisions of RCW
21.20.010,
21.20.140 (1) or (2), or
21.20.180 through
21.20.230, is liable to the person buying the security from him or
her, who may sue either at law or in equity to recover the consideration
paid for the security, together with interest at eight percent per annum
from the date of payment, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees, less
the amount of any income received on the security, upon the tender of
the security, or for damages if he or she no longer owns the security.
Damages are the amount that would be recoverable upon a tender less (a)
the value of the security when the buyer disposed of it and (b) interest
at eight percent per annum from the date
(6) Any tender
specified in this section may be made at any time before entry of
judgment. |
§ 42(2).
Liability of
seller to purchaser. (a) A person is liable to the purchaser if the
person sells a security in violation of:
(i) Section 13 (2) or (3) of
this act; or
(ii) Section 34 of this act,
the purchaser not knowing the untruth or omission or violation and the
seller not sustaining the burden of proof that the seller did not know
and, in the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known of the
untruth or omission or violation.
(b) An action under (a) of this
subsection is governed by the following:
(i) The purchaser may
maintain an action to recover the consideration paid for the security,
less the amount of any income received on the security, and interest at
eight percent per annum from the date of the purchase, costs, and
reasonable attorneys' fees determined by the court, upon the tender of
the security, or for actual damages as provided in (b)(iii) of this
subsection;
(ii) The tender referred to
in (b)(i) of this subsection may be made any time before entry of
judgment. Tender requires only notice in a record of ownership of the
security and willingness to exchange the security for the amount
specified. A purchaser that no longer owns the security may recover
actual damages as provided in (b)(iii) of this subsection; and
(iii) Actual damages in an action arising
under this subsection are the amount that would be recoverable upon a
tender less the value of the security when the purchaser disposed of it,
and interest at eight percent per annum from the date of the purchase,
costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees determined by the court. |
USA with additions
to retain existing civil liability under RCW 21.20.430(1). |
|
(c) [Liability of
purchaser to seller.] A person is liable to the seller if the
person buys a security by means of an untrue statement of a material
fact or omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statement made, in light of the circumstances under which it is made,
not misleading, the seller not knowing of the untruth or omission, and
the purchaser not sustaining the burden of proof that the purchaser did
not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known
of the untruth or omission. An action under this subsection is governed
by the following:
(1) The seller may
maintain an action to recover the security, and any income received on
the security, costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees determined by the
court, upon the tender of the purchase price, or for actual damages as
provided in paragraph (3).
(2) The tender
referred to in paragraph (1) may be made any time before entry of
judgment. Tender requires only notice in a record of the present
ability to pay the amount tendered and willingness to take delivery of
the security for the amount specified. If the purchaser no longer owns
the security, the seller may recover actual damages as provided in
paragraph (3).
(3) Actual damages
in an action arising under this subsection are the difference between
the price at which the security was sold and the value the security
would have had at the time of the sale in the absence of the purchaser’s
conduct causing liability, and interest [at the legal rate of interest]
from the date of the sale of the security, costs, and reasonable
attorneys’ fees determined by the court. |
(2) Any person who
buys a security in violation of the provisions of RCW
21.20.010 is liable to the person selling the security to him or
her, who may sue either at law or in equity to recover the security,
together with any income received on the security, upon tender of the
consideration received, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees, or if the
security cannot be recovered, for damages. Damages are the value of the
security when the buyer disposed of it, and any income received on the
security, less the consideration received for the security, plus
interest at eight percent per annum from the date of disposition, costs,
and reasonable attorneys' fees.
(6) Any tender
specified in this section may be made at any time before entry of
judgment. |
§ 42(3).
Liability of
purchaser to seller. (a) A person is liable to the seller if the person
buys a security in violation of section 34 of this act, the seller not
knowing of the untruth or omission or violation, and the purchaser not
sustaining the burden of proof that the purchaser did not know and, in
the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known of the untruth or
omission or violation.
(b) An action under this subsection
is governed by the following:
(i) The seller may maintain an
action to recover the security, and any income received on the security,
costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees determined by the court, upon the
tender of the purchase price, or for actual damages as provided in (b)(iii)
of this subsection;
(ii) The tender referred to in (b)(i)
of this subsection may be made any time before entry of judgment.
Tender requires only notice in a record of the present ability to pay
the amount tendered and willingness to take delivery of the security for
the amount specified. If the purchaser no longer owns the security, the
seller may recover actual damages as provided in (b)(iii) of this
subsection; and
(iii) Actual damages in an action
arising under this subsection are the difference between the price at
which the security was sold and the value the security would have had at
the time of the sale in the absence of the purchaser's conduct causing
liability, and interest at eight percent per annum from the date of the
sale of the security, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees determined
by the court. |
USA with additional
language to reach any USA § 501 anti-fraud violation.
|
|
(d) [Liability of
unregistered broker-dealer and agent.] A person acting as a
broker-dealer or agent that sells or buys a security in violation of
Section 401(a), 402(a), or 506 is liable to the customer. The customer,
if a purchaser, may maintain an action for recovery of actual damages as
specified in subsections (b)(1) through (3), or, if a seller, for a
remedy as specified in subsections (c)(1) through (3). |
|
§ 42(4).
Liability of
unregistered broker-dealer and sales agent. A person acting as a
broker-dealer or sales agent that sells or buys a security in violation
of section 21(1), 22(1), or 39 of this act is liable to the customer.
The customer, if a purchaser, may maintain an action for recovery of
actual damages as specified in subsection (2)(b) of this section, or, if
a seller, for a remedy as specified in subsection (3)(b) of this
section. |
USA. |
|
(e) [Liability of
unregistered investment adviser and investment adviser representative.]
A person acting as an investment adviser or investment adviser
representative that provides investment advice for compensation in
violation of Section 403(a), 404(a), or 506 is liable to the client.
The client may maintain an action to recover the consideration paid for
the advice, interest [at the legal rate of interest] from the date of
payment, costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees determined by the court.
(f) [Liability
for investment advice.] A person that receives directly or
indirectly any consideration for providing investment advice to another
person and that employs a device, scheme, or artifice to defraud the
other person or engages in an act, practice, or course of business that
operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit on the other person, is
liable to the other person. An action under this subsection is
governed by the following:
(1) The person
defrauded may maintain an action to recover the consideration paid for
the advice and the amount of any actual damages caused by the fraudulent
conduct, interest [at the legal rate of interest] from the date of the
fraudulent conduct, costs, and reasonable attorneys’ fees determined by
the court, less the amount of any income received as a result of the
fraudulent conduct.
(2) This subsection
does not apply to a broker-dealer or its agents if the investment advice
provided is solely incidental to transacting business as a broker-dealer
and no special compensation is received for the investment advice. |
|
§ 42
(5)
Liability of
unregistered investment adviser and investment adviser representative.
A person acting as an investment adviser or investment adviser
representative that provides investment advice for compensation in
violation of section 23(1), 24(1), or 39 of this act is liable to the
client. The client may maintain an action to recover the consideration
paid for the advice, interest at eight percent per annum from the date
of payment, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees determined by the
court.
(6) Liability for investment
advice. A person that receives directly or indirectly any consideration
for providing investment advice to another person and that employs a
device, scheme, or artifice to defraud the other person or engages in an
act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as a
fraud or deceit on the other person is liable to the other person. An
action under this subsection is governed by the following:
(a) The person defrauded may
maintain an action to recover the consideration paid for the advice and
the amount of any actual damages caused by the fraudulent conduct,
interest at eight percent per annum from the date of the fraudulent
conduct, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees determined by the court,
less the amount of any income received as a result of the fraudulent
conduct; and
(b)
This subsection does not apply to a
broker-dealer or its sales agents if the investment advice provided is
solely incidental to transacting business as a broker-dealer and no
special compensation is received for the investment advice. |
USA |
|
(g) [Joint and
several liability.] The following persons are liable jointly and
severally with and to the same extent as persons liable under
subsections (b) through (f):
(1) a person that
directly or indirectly controls a person liable under subsections (b)
through (f), unless the controlling person sustains the burden of proof
that the person did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care
could not have known, of the existence of conduct by reason of which the
liability is alleged to exist;
(2) an individual
who is a managing partner, executive officer, or director of a person
liable under subsections (b) through (f), including an individual having
a similar status or performing similar functions, unless the individual
sustains the burden of proof that the individual did not know and, in
the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the existence
of conduct by reason of which the liability is alleged to exist;
(3) an individual
who is an employee of or associated with a person liable under
subsections (b) through (f) and who materially aids the conduct giving
rise to the liability, unless the individual sustains the burden of
proof that the individual did not know and, in the exercise of
reasonable care could not have known, of the existence of conduct by
reason of which the liability is alleged to exist; and
(4) a person that is
a broker-dealer, agent, investment adviser, or investment adviser
representative that materially aids the conduct giving rise to the
liability under subsections (b) through (f), unless the person sustains
the burden of proof that the person did not know and, in the exercise of
reasonable care could not have known, of the existence of conduct by
reason of which liability is alleged to exist. |
(3) Every person who
directly or indirectly controls a seller or buyer liable under
subsection (1) or (2) above, every partner, officer, director or person
who occupies a similar status or performs a similar function of such
seller or buyer, every employee of such a seller or buyer who materially
aids in the transaction, and every broker-dealer, salesperson, or person
exempt under the provisions of RCW
21.20.040 who materially aids in the transaction is also liable
jointly and severally with and to the same extent as the seller or
buyer, unless such person sustains the burden of proof that he or she
did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have
known, of the existence of the facts by reason of which the liability is
alleged to exist. There is contribution as in cases of contract among
the several persons so liable.
|
§ 42(7).
Joint and
several liability. The following persons are liable jointly and
severally with and to the same extent as persons liable under
subsections (2) through (6) of this section:
(a) A person that directly or
indirectly controls a person liable under subsections (2) through (6) of
this section, unless the controlling person sustains the burden of proof
that the person did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable care,
could not have known of the existence of conduct by reason of which the
liability is alleged to exist;
(b) An individual who is a managing
partner, executive officer, or director of a person liable under
subsections (2) through (6) of this section, including an individual
having a similar status or performing similar functions, unless the
individual sustains the burden of proof that the individual did not know
and, in the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known of the
existence of conduct by reason of which the liability is alleged to
exist;
(c) An individual who is an employee of
or associated with a person liable under subsections (2) through (6) of
this section, and who materially aids the conduct giving rise to the
liability, unless the individual sustains the burden of proof that the
individual did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable care, could
not have known of the existence of conduct by reason of which the
liability is alleged to exist; and
(d)
A person that is a broker-dealer, sales agent,
investment adviser, or investment adviser representative that materially
aids the conduct giving rise to the liability under subsections (2)
through (6) of this section, unless the person sustains the burden of
proof that the person did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable
care, could not have known of the existence of conduct by reason of
which liability is alleged to exist. |
USA |
|
(h) [Right of
contribution.] A person liable under this section has a right of
contribution as in cases of contract against any other person liable
under this section for the same conduct. |
See last sentence of
RCW 21.20.430(3) (“There is contribution as in cases of contract among
the several persons so liable.”).
|
§ 42(8).
Right of
contribution. A person liable under this section has a right of
contribution as in cases of contract against any other person liable
under this section for the same conduct. |
USA |
|
(i) [Survival of
cause of action.] A cause of action under this section survives the
death of an individual who might have been a plaintiff or defendant. |
(4)(a) Every cause
of action under this statute survives the death of any person who might
have been a plaintiff or defendant.
|
§ 42(9).
Survival of
cause of action. A cause of action under this section survives the
death of an individual who might have been a plaintiff or defendant. |
USA |
|
(j) [Statute of
limitations.] A person may not obtain relief:
(1) under subsection
(b) for violation of Section 301, or under subsection (d) or (e), unless
the action is instituted within one year after the violation occurred;
or
(2) under subsection
(b), other than for violation of Section 301, or under subsection (c) or
(f), unless the action is instituted within the earlier of two years
after discovery of the facts constituting the violation or five years
after the violation. |
(b) No person may
sue under this section more than three years after the contract of sale
for any violation of the provisions of RCW
21.20.140 (1) or (2) or
21.20.180 through
21.20.230, or more than three years after a violation of the
provisions of RCW
21.20.010, either was discovered by such person or would have been
discovered by him or her in the exercise of reasonable care. …
|
§ 42(10).
Statute of
limitations. A person may not obtain relief:
(a) Under subsection (2) of this
section for violation of section 13 (2) or (3) of this act, or under
subsection (4) or (5) of this section, unless the action is instituted
within three years after the violation occurred; or
(b) Under subsection (2) of this section,
other than for violation of section 13 of this act, or under subsection
(3) or (6) of this section, unless the action is instituted within the
three years after the facts constituting the violation were either
discovered by such person or would have been discovered by him or her in
the exercise of reasonable care. |
USA approach, but
the current three year limitations provision is retained along with the
current constructive notice provision, consistent with RCW
21.20.430(4)(b). |
|
(k) [No
enforcement of violative contract.] A person that has made, or has
engaged in the performance of, a contract in violation of this [Act] or
a rule adopted or order issued under this [Act], or that has acquired a
purported right under the contract with knowledge of conduct by reason
of which its making or performance was in violation of this [Act], may
not base an action on the contract.
|
(5) No person who
has made or engaged in the performance of any contract in violation of
any provision of this chapter or any rule or order hereunder, or who has
acquired any purported right under any such contract with knowledge of
the facts by reason of which its making or performance was in violation,
may base any suit on the contract….
|
§ 42(11)(a).
No
enforcement of violative contract. A person that has made, or has
engaged in the performance of, a contract in violation of this chapter
or a rule adopted or order issued under this chapter, or that has
acquired a purported right under the contract with knowledge of conduct
by reason of which its making or performance was in violation of this
chapter, may not base an action on the contract. |
USA |
|
|
RCW 21.20.135
License as salesperson or broker-dealer prerequisite to suit for
commission.
No suit or action
shall be brought for the collection of a commission for the sale of a
security, as defined within this chapter without alleging and proving
that the plaintiff was a duly licensed salesperson for an issuer or a
broker-dealer, or exempt under the provisions of RCW
21.20.040, or a duly licensed broker-dealer in this state or another
state at the time the alleged cause of action arose. |
§ 42(11)(b).
No
suit or action may be brought for the collection of a commission for the
sale of a security, as defined within this chapter, without alleging and
proving that the plaintiff was a duly registered sales agent for an
issuer or a broker-dealer, or exempt under section 22(2)of this act, or
a duly registered broker-dealer, or exempt under section 21(2) of this
act in this state or another state at the time the alleged cause of
action arose. |
RCW 21.20.135 is
retained. |
|
(l) [No
contractual waiver.] A condition, stipulation, or provision binding
a person purchasing or selling a security or receiving investment advice
to waive compliance with this [Act] or a rule adopted or order issued
under this [Act] is void. |
.430(5)……Any condition,
stipulation, or provision binding any person acquiring any security to
waive compliance with any provision of this chapter or any rule or order
hereunder is void. |
§ 42(12).
No
contractual waiver. A condition, stipulation, or provision binding a
person purchasing or selling a security or receiving investment advice
to waive compliance with this chapter or a rule adopted or order issued
under this chapter is void. |
USA |
|
(m) [Survival of
other rights or remedies.] The rights and remedies provided by this
[Act] are in addition to any other rights or remedies that may exist,
but this [Act] does not create a cause of action not specified in this
section or Section 411(e). |
|
§ 42(13).
Survival of
other rights or remedies. The rights and remedies provided by this
chapter are in addition to any other rights or remedies that may exist,
but this chapter does not create a cause of action not specified in this
section, section 31(5) of this act, or section 70 of this act. |
USA with additional
language to retain the current cause of action against debenture
companies under RCW 21.20.745. |
|
. |
(7) Notwithstanding
subsections (1) through (6) of this section, if an initial offer or sale
of securities that are exempt from registration under RCW
21.20.310 is made by this state or its agencies, political
subdivisions, municipal or quasi-municipal corporations, or other
instrumentality of one or more of the foregoing and is in violation of
RCW
21.20.010(2), and any such issuer, member of the governing body,
committee member, public officer, director, employee, or agent of such
issuer acting on its behalf, or person in control of such issuer, member
of the governing body, committee member, public officer, director,
employee, or agent of such person acting on its behalf, materially aids
in the offer or sale, such person is liable to the purchaser of the
security only if the purchaser establishes scienter on the part of the
defendant. The word "employee" or the word "agent," as such words are
used in this subsection, do not include a bond counsel or an
underwriter. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall this subsection be
applied to require purchasers to establish scienter on the part of bond
counsels or underwriters. The provisions of this subsection are
retroactive and apply to any action commenced but not final before July
27, 1985. In addition, the provisions of this subsection apply to any
action commenced on or after July 27, 1985. |
Notwithstanding subsections
(2), (3), and (7) through (13) of this section, if an initial offer or
sale of securities that are exempt from registration under section 8 of
this act is made by this state or its agencies, political subdivisions,
municipal or quasi-municipal corporations, or other instrumentality of
one or more of the foregoing in this subsection, and is in violation of
section 34(2) of this act, and any such issuer, member of the governing
body, committee member, public officer, director, employee, or agent of
such issuer acting on its behalf, or person in control of such issuer,
member of the governing body, committee member, public officer,
director, employee, or agent of such person acting on its behalf,
materially aids in the offer or sale, such person is liable to the
purchaser of the security only if the purchaser establishes scienter on
the part of the defendant. The word "employee" or the word "agent," as
such words are used in this subsection, do not include a bond counsel or
an underwriter. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall this subsection
be applied to require purchasers to establish scienter on the part of
bond counsels or underwriters. The provisions of this subsection are
retroactive and apply to any action commenced but not final before July
27, 1985. In addition, the provisions of this subsection apply to any
action commenced on or after July 27, 1985. |
RCW 21.20.430(7)
retained. |
|
. |
RCW 21.20.435
Assurance of discontinuance of violations -- Acceptance -- Filing.
In the enforcement
of this chapter, the director may accept an assurance of discontinuance
of violations of the provisions of this chapter from any person deemed
by the director to be in violation hereof. Any such assurance shall be
in writing, may state that the person giving such assurance does not
admit to any violation of this chapter, and shall be filed with and
subject to the approval of the superior court of the county in which the
alleged violator resides or has his or her principal place of business,
or in Thurston county. Proof of failure to comply with the assurance of
discontinuance shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this
chapter. |
|
USA (eliminating RCW
21.20.435). |
|
§510. RESCISSION
OFFERS. tc \l2 "SECTION 510. RESCISSION OFFERS.
A purchaser, seller, or recipient of
investment advice may not maintain an action under Section 509 if:
(1) The purchaser,
seller, or recipient of investment advice receives in a record, before
the action is instituted:
(A) an offer stating
the respect in which liability under Section 509 may have arisen and
fairly advising the purchaser, seller, or recipient of investment
advice of that person’s rights in connection with the offer, and any
financial or other information necessary to correct all material
misrepresentations or omissions in the information that was required by
this [Act] to be furnished to that person at the time of the purchase,
sale, or investment advice;
(B) if the basis for
relief under this section may have been a violation of Section 509(b),
an offer to repurchase the security for cash, payable on delivery of the
security, equal to the consideration paid, and interest [at the legal
rate of interest] from the date of the purchase, less the amount of any
income received on the security, or, if the purchaser no longer owns the
security, an offer to pay the purchaser upon acceptance of the offer
damages in an amount that would be recoverable upon a tender, less the
value of the security when the purchaser disposed of it, and interest
[at the legal rate of interest] from the date of the purchase in cash
equal to the damages computed in the manner provided in this subsection;
(C) if the basis for
relief under this section may have been a violation of Section 509(c),
an offer to tender the security, on payment by the seller of an amount
equal to the purchase price paid, less income received on the security
by the purchaser and interest [at the legal rate of interest] from the
date of the sale; or if the purchaser no longer owns the security, an
offer to pay the seller upon acceptance of the offer, in cash, damages
in the amount of the difference between the price at which the security
was purchased and the value the security would have had at the time of
the purchase in the absence of the purchaser’s conduct that may have
caused liability and interest [at the legal rate of interest] from the
date of the sale;
(D) if the basis for
relief under this section may have been a violation of Section 509(d);
and if the customer is a purchaser, an offer to pay as specified in
subparagraph (B); or, if the customer is a seller, an offer to tender or
to pay as specified in subparagraph (C);
(E) if the basis for
relief under this section may have been a violation of Section 509(e),
an offer to reimburse in cash the consideration paid for the advice and
interest [at the legal rate of interest] from the date of payment; or
(F) if the basis for
relief under this section may have been a violation of Section 509(f),
an offer to reimburse in cash the consideration paid for the advice, the
amount of any actual damages that may have been caused by the conduct,
and interest [at the legal rate of interest] from the date of the
violation causing the loss;
(2) the offer under
paragraph 1 states that it must be accepted by the purchaser, seller, or
recipient of investment advice within 30 days after the date of its
receipt by the purchaser, seller, or recipient of investment advice or
any shorter period, of not less than three days, that the administrator,
by order, specifies;
(3) the offeror has
the present ability to pay the amount offered or to tender the security
under paragraph (1);
(4) the offer under
paragraph (1) is delivered to the purchaser, seller, or recipient of
investment advice, or sent in a manner that ensures receipt by the
purchaser, seller, or recipient of investment advice; and
(5) the purchaser,
seller, or recipient of investment advice that accepts the offer under
paragraph (1) in a record within the period specified under paragraph
(2) is paid in accordance with the terms of the offer. |
RCW 21.20.430(4)(b) … No
person may sue under this section if the buyer or seller receives a
written rescission offer, which has been passed upon by the director
before suit and at a time when he or she owned the security, to refund
the consideration paid together with interest at eight percent per annum
from the date of payment, less the amount of any income received on the
security in the case of a buyer, or plus the amount of income received
on the security in the case of a seller. |
§43.
RESCISSION OFFERS.
A purchaser, seller, or recipient of investment
advice may not maintain an action under section 42 of this act if:
(1) The purchaser, seller, or
recipient of investment advice receives in a record, before the action
is instituted:
(a) An offer stating the respect
in which liability under section 42 of this act may have arisen and
fairly advising the purchaser, seller, or recipient of investment advice
of that person's rights in connection with the offer, and any financial
or other information necessary to correct all material
misrepresentations or omissions in the information that was required by
this chapter to be furnished to that person at the time of the purchase,
sale, or investment advice; and
(b) If the basis for relief under
this section may have been a violation of section 42(2) of this act, an
offer to repurchase the security for cash, payable on delivery of the
security, equal to the consideration paid, and interest at eight percent
per annum from the date of the purchase, less the amount of any income
received on the security, or, if the purchaser no longer owns the
security, an offer to pay the purchaser upon acceptance of the offer
damages in an amount that would be recoverable upon a tender, less the
value of the security when the purchaser disposed of it, and interest at
eight percent per annum from the date of the purchase in cash equal to
the damages computed in the manner provided in this subsection; or
(c) If the basis for relief under
this section may have been a violation of section 42(3) of this act, an
offer to tender the security, on payment by the seller of an amount
equal to the purchase price paid, less income received on the security
by the purchaser and interest at eight percent per annum from the date
of the sale; or if the purchaser no longer owns the security, an offer
to pay the seller upon acceptance of the offer, in cash, damages in the
amount of the difference between the price at which the security was
purchased and the value the security would have had at the time of the
purchase in the absence of the purchaser's conduct that may have caused
liability and interest at eight percent per annum from the date of the
sale; or
(d) If the basis for relief under
this section may have been a violation of section 42(4) of this act; and
if the customer is a purchaser, an offer to pay as specified in (b) of
this subsection; or, if the customer is a seller, an offer to tender or
to pay as specified in (c) of this subsection; or
(e) If the basis for relief under
this section may have been a violation of section 42(5) of this act, an
offer to reimburse in cash the consideration paid for the advice and
interest at eight percent per annum from the date of payment; or
(f) If the basis for relief under
this section may have been a violation of section 42(6) of this act, an
offer to reimburse in cash the consideration paid for the advice, the
amount of any actual damages that may have been caused by the conduct,
and interest at eight percent per annum from the date of the violation
causing the loss;
(2) The offer under subsection (1) of
this section states that it must be accepted by the purchaser, seller,
or recipient of investment advice within thirty days after the date of
its receipt by the purchaser, seller, or recipient of investment advice
or any shorter period, of not less than three days, that the director,
by order or otherwise, specifies;
(3) The offeror has, in a separate
account, cash on hand or other liquid assets sufficient to pay the
amount offered or the present ability to tender the security under
subsection (1) of this section, unless:
(a) The filing made pursuant to
subsection (6) of this section is made at least ten business days before
the offering; and
(b) The offer is passed upon by
the director;
(4) The offer under subsection (1) of
this section is delivered to the purchaser, seller, or recipient of
investment advice, or sent in a manner that ensures receipt by the
purchaser, seller, or recipient of investment advice;
(5) The purchaser, seller, or
recipient of investment advice that accepts the offer under subsection
(1) of this section in a record within the period specified under
subsection (2) of this section is paid in accordance with the terms of
the offer; and
(6) The offer is filed with the
director on or before the offering is made and conforms in form and
content with a rule prescribed by the director. If the basis for relief
under this section may have been a violation of section 13 of this act,
the director may require that a filing under this subsection be
accompanied by the fee that would have been paid had the offering that
is the subject of the potential violation been made in compliance with
section 13 of this act. |
USA with the
following additions:
Conjuctions to
clarify requirements.
Cash or other liquid
assets standard is used for the ability to fund rescission liability.
Availability of such assets affects the filing requirements.
USA optional
paragraph (6), requiring a filing, is included, with additional language
addressing the time for filing and applicable fees.
When the offeror
does not have cash or other liquid assets, the Director must pass upon
the rescission offer. |
|
|
|
§ 44.
Sections 34 through 43 of this act
are each added to chapter 21.20A RCW (created in section 115 of this
act) and codified with the subchapter heading of "Fraud and
Liabilities." |
Code Reviser
Instructions |
| |









|